Post suggestions and comments about below. I reserve the right to remove them at my discretion, especially if they have a clear political angle. Pure gas is a nonpartisan issue. I'm a left-wing Democrat, many users of this site are right-wing Republicans, even Tea Party, and yet we can all agree that ethanol policy is a mistake. It's not a liberal or conservative policy, it's the result of heavy lobbying by the ethanol industry, like ADM, combined with a massive blunder by the EPA in their attempt to spur the adoption of E85 vehicles back in 2007. We can all get along on this.

Comments about specific stations are deleted – those should go in the station comments. This page is for general comments about the site and pure gas, of interest to all visitors. For example, if a station no longer serves pure gas, just remove it. If you know of one that's not listed, don't comment here - add it! Also, comments requesting that gas prices be added will be deleted. Read the About page  or just think for a minute about how this site is updated.

My small engines has never ran better – bob, hertford (January 20, 2015)......All our 4 cars did & do run quieter, smoother & have a trace more low rpm torque, in the range that is most helpful for economy. Who woulda thunk et, that 100 purrrr-cent gasoline would make gasoline engines purrrr!!!??? Who woulda thunk et, that 114 octane ethanol, which works wonderfully in high compression ratio(16:1) ethanol engines, would NOT work well in low compression ratio (9:1 to 12:1) gasoline engines, designed to work best with 87 octane, 100 purrrr-cent gasoline......NOT the "ethanol in gasoline" industry or the EPA. It does prove that ethanol engine engineers are good, designing ethanol engines that work best with 100% ethanol & gasoline engine engineers are good, designing engines that work best with........100% gasoline. – litesongEverett, WA (January 21, 2015)
Here's some good news for your Wednesday! – JohnFort Collins, CO (January 21, 2015)
Here's some good news – John, Fort Collins, CO (January 21, 2015).....John, The Feinstein/Coburn bill to repeal corn ethanol mandates has been in the hopper since 2013. Presently, in the form of a Feinstein/ Toomey attachment to the Keystone XL pipeline approval legislation, we'll see if "spin the dial" politics can seed & blossom one lowly flower. – litesongEverett, WA (January 21, 2015)
Thanks for setting up the site. Been using it for a few years... – AttaBoyFlorida (January 22, 2015)
I found your website a year and a half ago and it's been a lifesaver for me(and especially for my outboard and garden equipment). What occured to me has probably already occured to others, but what I have realized is that, because this website is maintained by gasoline business owners or their consumers, the number of gas stations listed are very likely under-reported because not everybody knows this website exists. I can't think of any solutions that don't take money to implement, but I was wondering what the general thought here was on that issue. – RonCypress, Tx. (January 23, 2015)
Mention it on any travel/vehicle forums you post on. Also verbally to friends, especially including users of small gas engines, generators, and marine engines. – dukestermemphis (January 25, 2015)
During the 10% ethanol blends' rapid price plunge, the E0/10% ethanol blend gap widened to 25% to 40%(more?), here in Washington state. This morning I found an E0 station in Ellensburg, selling E0 for a reduced 16% over the cost of low-ball 10% ethanol blends. So maybe the price gap between E0 & 10% ethanol blends is decreasing......& might the plunging gasoline prices be slowing? – litesongEverett, WA (January 26, 2015)
Ron of Cypress, TX - Under-reporting is a natural consequence of a user-sourced site like this. As long as there is one station that's not listed here, we have under-reporting. But the advantage of user sourcing is that there is no bias toward any brand or region - if folks see a pure gas station, they can post it. I think in the end that's the optimum solution, although it may take a long time for awareness to build. The biggest effect on the site has been when major media, like the New York Times, mentions it; that's how it got its first big jump way back in January, 2010. Spread the word! – SamMadison, WI (January 27, 2015)
Last Update now shown on station listing. This was a good suggestion by Gregg from Tupelo a while back. Rather than make the site wider, I decided to yank the GPS coordinates from the station listing, since I doubt very many people actually type or cut and paste those rather than clicking the Google Earth or Map icons. You can always grab the GPS from the station details, anyway. It's good to see at a glance which listings are getting a bit stale. – SamMadison, WI (January 27, 2015)
Regarding "last update now showing on station listings", I would like to add a word of caution, check the detail section first to be sure the last update is a positive result. What I mean by this is that there are multiple listings for stations, airports, and marinas that may be out of fuel currently but still listed because they plan to restock or they are a seasonal business. Sometimes the last post about a station is a remark about them being out of fuel.

Don't drive out of your way before you have verified availability. If the phone number is missing then help by looking it up and adding it to the site. Also help keep the listings current by posting every time you visit a station.

Likewise don't forget to give the stations you visit a Pure-Gas card which Sam has provided the template for. They're easy to print off your computer.

Check with your state's governing agency that oversees gasoline sales. The state of Georgia actually advertises to help folks looking for E0 gas. Your state may not be aware of it and may like to know about it. – Jonathan LathburyAtlanta, Georgia (January 27, 2015)
Please enter the word shown below (reduces spam).
Click the image to generate a new one.